An accessible website starts with an empty findings list. We work through yours in the source code, worst blocker first. Every fix gets retested by keyboard and screen reader. Then we draft an accessibility statement that says exactly where your site stands.
Partner badges you can look up, numbers straight from client dashboards, and the businesses whose websites we've built. Here's the scoreboard so far.
What we do
“The entire process was seamless, easy, and incredibly user-friendly. They were patient and flexible with all the changes and back-and-forth... Most importantly, they absolutely nailed the brief.”
5 stars Google review
What is included
Four rules every fix job follows. They make the findings list shorter, and they keep it short.
Most findings live in a shared component. Fix it there once, and it's fixed on every page that uses it.
How a build runsLabelled fields, native buttons and ordered headings go into the source. A script that guesses at them after the page loads can't match that.
See the workSame steps, same assistive technology, and this time the expected result. Anything that fails goes back in the queue.
The proof we showAutomated accessibility checks run on every build. A new template can't quietly undo the work.
Questions people askThe argument
Fixed in the source
The markup itself gets corrected.
An overlay script
A toolbar painted over the problem.
Worst blocker first
The enquiry form before the blog.
Easiest first
Quick wins, and the form still broken.
Retested by hand
Each fix walked again by keyboard.
Marked as done
Closed in the tracker, never checked.
Guarded in the build
Automated checks fail the build if it slips.
Found at the next audit
A year of new templates, untested.
Honest about what's left
What it meets, what's open, and a contact.
A boilerplate pledge
Committed to accessibility, whatever that means.
How it runs
You see the page plan before design starts, and the design before we build. So there are no nasty surprises at the end.
Triage
We read the audit, ours or someone else's, and group every finding by the component that causes it.
What we deliver
What do people search before they call you?
Components
Shared parts come first: navigation, buttons, forms and dialogs. One fix there clears the same problem everywhere.
What we deliver
Monthly searches
Content
Then the page-level work. Headings go in order, images get described, link text makes sense on its own, and contrast comes up to AA.
What we deliver
Sentient / Inter
14.05:1Retest
We walk every fix again by keyboard and screen reader. Anything that fails goes back in the queue instead of into the log.
What we deliver
Statement
We draft an accessibility statement from the retest, add accessibility checks to the build, and hand over the log.
What we deliver
Baseline recorded
14 OctThe long read
Making an accessible website is ordinary development work, done with care. This is where the effort goes, and where it stops.
An audit of 100 pages rarely finds 100 separate problems. It finds a menu, a form and a card, each repeated on every page that uses them.
So we fix the component. Fixed once, fixed everywhere, and the findings list drops by a template's worth at a time.
Illustrative: a typical split, not a measurement of your site.
Overlay widgets promise accessibility with one line of script. They add a toolbar and try to repair the page as it loads.
But the page underneath stays the same. A screen reader still meets the broken markup. And the toolbar is one more thing to learn for people who already have their own tools set up.
We remove overlays where we find them, then fix what they were covering.
A ticket marked closed is a developer's opinion. Done means retested: the same steps, the same assistive technology, and the expected result this time.
Anything that fails goes back in the queue. The log you receive shows each finding, the fix, and the retest that passed it.
An accessibility statement is more useful than a pledge. A good one says what the site conforms to, says what's still broken, and gives people a way to report a problem and get an answer.
We draft it from the retest, so it reports where the site stands on the day it was written. It isn't a certificate. It stays accurate only if someone reviews it when the site changes.
Case studies
Speech Clinic
A search-led structure giving each therapy and each mobile service area its own page to land on.
Scope of work
MedPrescribe
An e-prescribing platform positioned as a product, automating booking through to delivery.
Scope of work
First Class First Aid
A booking site built around the codes employers send, not the course names.
Scope of work
Ovaya
An at-home fertility treatment page answering what arrives, when, and who watches each cycle.
Scope of work
Full Body MRI
A whole-body screening scan surfaced by the organ or condition people actually search for.
Scope of work
Search proof
Shopify Partner
Shopify stores built so search can read the whole catalogue, with tracking on every sale.
Google Partner
Partner status you can look up in Google's own directory. Every result above comes with the screenshot behind it.
Where we work
Engagements
Clear the findings
For a site with a recent audit and a findings list your team wants worked through.
Fixed, and kept fixed
For a site that will keep changing after the fixes land, and needs to stay where it ended up.
Tools and integrations
We pick the platform that suits your business. Then we connect the site to your booking system, your CRM and your ad accounts, so every enquiry lands where your team already works.
Client results
“Up until working with Casey, we had only had poor to mediocre experiences outsourcing work to agencies... instead of needing babysitting like the other agencies we worked with, he was not only completely dependable but also gave us sound suggestions on how to get better results.”
“Since going with Casey and his team, we have had nothing but wins! They are great communicators, but more importantly, have got awesome results with low lead costs.”
“As an experienced health professional I am a hard sceptic. Casey and his team over delivered on my project with an A+ website design having actively listened to every point I was seeking.”
“Casey has been an absolute standout! His personalised approach has been nothing short of incredible. We have had amazing results from the get-go.”
“Excellent company to deal with and their web design is incredible. Would use them again and again.”
“Casey was so empathetic and patient in listening to my ideas. He asked all the right questions and got me thinking on aspects I hadn't considered. He goes above and beyond.”
“If you're looking for a highly experienced, knowledgeable and ideas-driven marketing agency, look no further... He's helped transform our business from a fairly humble start-up to a fast growing and highly regarded service provider.”
“We have worked with Casey on a number of website projects and are super impressed with his promptness, communication, professionalism, and knowledge of the full suite of digital marketing... You and your team are second to none!”
“[They have] truly exceeded my expectations... They handle every detail with care, addressing any concerns or inquiries I had with remarkable responsiveness and genuine accommodation. The end result was nothing short of fantastic.”
Research & Articles
WCAG 2.2 AA explained for small business: what the standard asks, the 6 new criteria since 2.1, what Australian law expects, and checks you can run yourself.
Conversion tracking breaks when people decline cookies or block scripts. How consent mode and server-side events keep your lead numbers useful and private.
Product page design for online stores: what to show, in what order, and what Australian Consumer Law expects of your prices, returns and reviews. A checklist.
Questions
What you need to know before we start a conversation.
Not answered here? Ask us directly
You need a findings list to work from. If you have a recent one from another provider, we start from it. If you don't, our website accessibility audit comes first and the fixes start from its report. Either way, the quote is fixed before any code changes.
We'd steer you away from it. An overlay doesn't change the underlying markup. The problems are still there for anyone using their own assistive technology. Fixing the source code is the answer that lasts, and it's one we can retest.
Mostly not. Labels, headings and tab order are largely invisible to sighted visitors. A contrast fix can shift a colour, and a visible focus ring is a deliberate change. We show you those before they go live, so nothing on your site changes without your yes.
We don't promise full compliance, because nobody honestly can. Every finding in scope gets fixed and retested, and the statement records what the site meets. New pages and content can bring new issues. That's why the build checks stay in after we hand over.
Every fix job gets a fixed quote with line items after a free 15-minute call. We price the findings in scope, grouped by component. The number stays put as the list shrinks, and if the work takes longer than planned, that's our problem.
Some of the work helps search too. Clear headings, descriptive links and image text help search engines read a page as well as people. It's a side effect rather than the reason to do it. Still, it's a useful one, and nothing in an accessibility fix works against SEO.
Usually, yes. WordPress, Shopify and custom-coded sites all take the same kinds of fixes. We confirm we can get to the source code before we quote. If the templates are past saving, we'll tell you straight and price a rebuild instead.
